
Months ago, Sonny Gill left a comment on my post about “Becoming P2P: Principal characteristics of the new social business” that drew my interest:
Company/organizational culture is something I love getting into and am still learning a lot about.
One point of interest that intrigues me – and what you mentioned – is empowering your employees. Giving them not only the tools and structure to succeed, but empowerment and reinforcement from internal leaders – the attitude that not only spreads throughout the company but outside of the office also (as we all know, work/life intermingle so much). I say it’s intriguing because it’s such an integral part in making this culture change and a P2P business a success.
The biggest thing that companies will be asking though when reading this post, let alone your upcoming book, is ‘how the hell do we accomplish this?’ It sounds/is great, as how businesses function – internally and externally – is evolving, quick. But there’s definitely got to be a huge buy-in and sense of what a P2P culture looks and feels like.
The best way I know how to address Sonny’s question is this:
Don’t sell change. Ever. Instead, sell results. That’s what execs really want anyway
As always, the old adage about leading horses to water stands firm. First, you have to realize that “companies” aren’t what you’re working with. What you’re really dealing with are people. In other words, companies don’t make decisions. People make decisions. Particularly, leaders in this instance. If the leadership within a company refuses to commit to the type of change that will yield greater success for their business in the future (and starting immediately), I can’t help them. Heck, even Tony Robbins, Zig Ziglar and Dr. Phil can’t help them.
What’s important here isn’t to sell change. Nobody likes change. It’s scary, it’s risky, it’s unpredictable. You’ll never get very far selling fear, risk and uncertainty. Especially to that crowd. So you have to approach change from a very different angle: From the end result. From what they actually want to accomplish.
First things first: Uncovering the true objectives of an organization’s leadership team
Before you do anything, you want to uncover the leaders’ specific objectives (or wishes, even) and then create a picture of what the company (as an organization) will look like in this “fantasy” version of the future. This takes more work than it sounds. You would be amazed how many CEOs have absolutely no idea where they really want to be in 5 years. They’ll tend to throw around numbers that sounds good but aren’t based in reality, like… “We’re at $8.3B in revenue this year. I want to be at $12B by 2012.” Because $12B in 2012 sounds cool and the investors will love it. But that’s bullshit. It’s all about swagger, not reality.
In cases like this, when you ask the CEO how they’re going to get there, you get an equally nonsensical answer like, “we’ll sell more stuff” or “we’ll expand into new markets” or some other such generalization. No specifics. No action plan. Nothing but pipe dream. That’s dangerous and counterproductive. What you need to do is get them off the cowboy plan and get them back to reality: You have to get specific about their goals. These types of sessions aren’t about impressing anyone. They’re about getting down to business, which starts with getting back to reality.
If they want to hit $12B by 2012, fine. Work your way backwards from that. What’s it going to take? Probably some key acquisitions, first and foremost. Is that even possible? Are they in a position to pull it off without risking too much exposure? Does it even make sense to try and grow that quickly? What else do they need to do? Look for strategic partnerships? Expand distribution? Capture more market share? All of the above? Okay, you have 24 months. Show me on a 24-month schedule/timeline how you currently plan to accomplish that.
And guess what: Most of the time, that plan doesn’t actually exist. It got as far as being turned into a few bullet points on a slide in someone’s powerpoint presentation six months ago. So you have to start from scratch and see what’s realistic and what isn’t. You have to work out all of the contingencies. It isn’t rocket science, but it takes work. And it takes organization. And it takes commitment. Before you can even get to how a company is going to address empowering their employees through a real cultural change, before a company is ready to actually pull this off across all of its departments as a matter of policy, it has to know exactly where it wants to go and what it will take to get there. Not only that, but the leadership team has to both understand and accept that such empowerment is one of the ways they will get there.
Second: Mapping out the start, the “finish” and everything in between
Growth, change and success are hard. You have to map it all out, starting with where you are, where you want to go, and all the points in between if you want to have a shot at actually pulling it off. So change management, which is really what we’re talking about here, starts with that process. And that process starts with painting a crystal clear picture of what you want the organization to look like at the end of the process. (More like a milestone than a finish line, but that’s a topic for another day.)
Now, in order to hit the numbers the CEO threw at you, you really have to be able to create a detailed snapshot of the company in this specific future. What it looks like. Where it operates. How it operates. How it is structured. How it executes on its activities. You have to not only create a snapshot of what it looks like on the outside, but also on the inside, layer by layer, like a CAT scan.
Understanding changes in cultural dynamics and the evolution of technology, you can then zoom in from the portrait/snapshot of the company to its structure, then to its processes, then to the skills of its members. From there, you can reverse-engineer the adaptive phases that the company needs to go through. To be realistic, the example I gave you (24 months) is too short when it comes to true cultural change for a company that didn’t have much of a culture to begin with. It takes time for organizations, especially large ones, to develop the kind of social and emotional sophistication to do this well. It takes maturity, and maturity takes time. It isn’t something you can accelerate or optimize.
In this example then, the company’s strategy would focus a lot more on acquisitions and partnerships than growth through cultural change. But it isn’t to say that a cultural evolution couldn’t begin to happen during that time period. In order for the strategic changes to be a success, a lot of internal work needs to ensure that these changes won’t become a liability when it comes to simple things like customer service, customer experiences, internal communications between divisions, brand erosion, etc. You can’t divorce culture from infrastructure. Companies that don’t understand that always fail at creating efficient (and sustainable) versions of either.
Basic Lessons to keep in mind:
Anyway… Long story short: The most important thing when trying to get buy-in is to help clarify exactly where the company wants to be in 5, 10, 20 years. Not pie-in-the-sky bullshit, but specifics. Once you have that, you can paint a clear picture of what the future of the company NEEDS to look like. Now you’ve flipped change on its head. Instead of selling uncertainty, you’re selling clarity.
Knowing where you’re going is 90% of getting there. Most company execs are so focused on meeting numbers this month and this quarter that they just aren’t able to look beyond the here and now long enough to actually drive their businesses anywhere. They’re too busy reacting to the next pothole or turn ahead. By helping them see 1 year into the future, then 2, then 5, than 10, you can help them impact their numbers now, this quarter, this half, this fiscal year, by giving their performance context in relation to where they want to actually take their business.
That’s a big part of what I do, and everything has to start with that. Before you can get to cultural change management, you have to make sure the leadership team knows where it wants to go and what it needs to do to get there.
The caveat: Lazy execs and the reality of horses that just won’t drink
But with all of that, if the CEO and the COO and the VP of this and that just don’t want to change their ways, if they are more committed to their game of golf and corner office and third McMansion than to the success of their business, there isn’t much I can do to help them. I already know I can’t fix stupid. I’m pretty sure I can’t fix lazy either.
People have to want to be successful, and it can be hard to convince a late career exec making seven or eight figures and eying retirement in five to ten years that success is about more than the wealth they’ve already amassed. Success is a frame of mind they either want to have or not. The biggest lesson for them is this: Success doesn’t live in the past. Memories do. Success lives in the here and now and tomorrow. It really doesn’t matter what you accomplished ten years ago. What matters is what you’re doing today, and what you’ll accomplish next. Anything else is just ego. Throw away the plaques and the trophies. They aren’t who you are.
A guy who just wants to enjoy the trappings of success but isn’t willing to work his ass off to perpetuate that success is a guy who’s given up. That kind of individual is completely worthless to me, and more importantly, to his/her organization.
Unless the rest of the management team and I can appeal to their sense of pride and self worth, and tap into the ambition that fueled them in their youth, they’re basically in the way. Individuals like these must either get back in the game or move on if you want the organization to evolve. I can’t light a fire under their ass every single day. I can do it for a while, but eventually they have to step up and want to run the ball all on their own.
So, all this to say that you won’t win them all, Sonny. Execs who have grown complacent, live in denial, or refuse to accept that their companies are headed straight to the crapper in ten years are beyond being reasoned with. I’ll only get so far with them before I move on to someone who won’t waste my time.
In the end, I can’t help people who don’t want to help themselves. And since organizations are really collectives of people, you either find leadership teams made up of people who are willing to do whatever it takes to save and/or make their businesses kick ass, or management teams made up of people who are happy to pretend that everything is golden even though their business is either stalled or in the tank. Usually, the latter are the first to blame the economy or cheap imports or whatever else they can throw a cat at to explain slow, flat or negative growth rather than take the blame themselves.
I am not a miracle worker. I wish I were, but I am not. I help people who are serious about making their business truly successful and are looking for good honest help. The rest, I try not to waste my time with. It is far too precious as it is.
At some point soon, I’ll actually go over how to create really solid internal cultures both from the top down (trust, leadership, mentoring and hiring practices) and from the bottom up (trust, engagement, tribe mentality, alignment with the organization’s belief system), so don’t go too far. We will visit this topic again.

















I came here all hot ‘n excited by the word in the title: Integration
Too bad that’s the only time it’s mentioned in this post – guess I’ll have to find some place to cool down now
Before it can be integrated, the culture of the company has to be ready for it. This is the first step. If what I talked about in this post doesn’t happen, whatever comes next won’t work.
[...] Social media integration and change management: Overcoming the … Posted in Comentário, Media | Tagged account-planning, change-management, Media, [...]
Olivier,
I’ve found it comes down to clarity of objectives.
Sure, businesses are looking to make things happen – but if they don’t really know what those things are that they’re trying to make happen (beyond “create innovative and disruptive technology”) then we’re all sunk.
I turned away business a couple of weeks ago – told the guy that, sorry, I can’t help him, since he didn’t have a real business objective. I may have made him mad in the process – and he probably went out and found someone else who could help him promote his business.
But I told him, in effect, what you’re saying in the post – he’s in denial, it’s not going to go anywhere near where he wants it to go, and he’s throwing his money away.
I’m sleeping okay at night.
And he still needs those objectives, which I just can’t help him with.
Yep. It happens a lot.
Sometimes, you can help them identify their own objectives, but some of them simply refuse to do the work. I don’t work with them anymore either. Too much of a headache. No focus, no targets = waste of time.
The other problem with “absentee” (i.e., “Here, but not really here”) upper-division execs is that inevitably that mindset trickles down through the ranks.
Suddenly the VP and director-level managers are infected by the “I’m only here to get mine and go home” attitude.
Then the front line starts to sag–”Where are all the managers? Why aren’t I getting trained on this? Why do I have four sets of totally contradictory projects? Why am I getting chewed out for performance when I don’t even know what the hell I’m supposed to be doing?”
Your post also makes we wonder, from your perspective as someone who has done a lot of business consulting, which is harder: to re-motivate a C-level or VP suite that has lost their edge, or to redirect a group of executives that are working hard, but have their blinders on so badly that they can’t see anything but their own strategy?
This piece offers some great reflections. I share similar ideas in Part 7 of the Social Media Primer: The SAPLING Approach to Leveraging Social Media (http://tiny.cc/SMinOrgsPrimer7).
I’ve also been thinking a lot about the cultural issues. Just as you argue we shouldn’t sell change, I wonder if we also should dial back on pushing the need for different cultural values. In Part 4 of the Social Media Primer (http://tiny.cc/SMinOrgsPrimer4), I emphasize the link between cultural values and social media, but I lead with performance values, which are generally embraced in most organizations and are much easier to get leaders to accept as reasons to move forward. My basic approach is to try to work with the existing culture and use where they are today as a starting point. Even in a culture that isn’t fully committed to innovation and /or engagement, social media can produce significant benefits – and as those benefits accrue, the underlying values will evolve to enable further successes. That approach won’t work in all cases, but it can enable organizations that have potential but a relatively weak starting point to still move forward and grow stronger as they increase their engagement.
One other thing that I give a lot of thought to, which you also allude to, is the fact that leaders are insufficiently trained (either through education or experience) to know how to provide the kind of strategic perspective their organizations need. Even when they’re well intentioned and motivated to succeed, they don’t seem to have the requisite skills to look beyond the short-term, tactical urgencies to focus on longer-term, strategic priorities. Even the hardest working leaders don’t work as smartly as they could or should.
I’ve included this item in a Social Media in Organizations (SMinOrgs) S.M.A.R.T. News Digest focused on “social leadership.” Here’s a link to it: http://www.sminorgs.net/2010/12/smart-news-social-leadership-i.html.
Thanks!
Courtney Hunt
Founder, SMinOrgs Community
69. Hello, you used to write great, but the last few posts have been kinda boring¡K I miss your great writings. Past several posts are just a bit out of track! come on!