
I’ve been a film fanatic ever since my parents took me to see the first Star Wars movie (now known simply as Episode IV). Since I’ve also been a big advertising fan since… well, since I was old enough to watch TV, it stands to reason that movie trailers (the advertising of movies) kind of rank pretty high on my list of attention-grabbers.
Let me say this again: I love movie trailers. Always have. Always will.
But here’s the rub: Most trailers these days aren’t any good. They used to be. There used to be a certain degree of savoir-faire when it came to cutting movie trailers. They were exciting. They made you want to see more. They made your mouth water.
Not so anymore.
Most trailers now seem to be disjointed and pointless. The rule of the day seems to be “okay, let’s throw as much crap as we can into that twenty-second spot as we possibly can. Priority 1: Explosions. Priority 2: The funniest lines in the movie. Oh… and let’s add 20 extra seconds of useless footage at the end just to explain the entire plot of the movie to the portion of the audience who isn’t savvy enough to want to see the movie without having it explained A-Z upfront.”
Yawn.
To be fair, note that I said “most” not “all.” Some trailers are great. But they are the exception rather than the rule.
And don’t even get me started with the TV trailers. Not even worth the virtual ink. Completely worthless.
So before I go on, let me throw a little note to the powers that be in Hollywood: Please, please, please, stop putting out lousy trailers. Please!!! Aside from the fact that bad trailers don’t entice people to go see the movies they advertise (no, really, think about it), those of us who look forward to them are getting tired of having our expectations shattered by remedial, poorly cut junk.
How hard is it to put together an exciting 30-60 second spot with 90+ minutes of footage? If my neighbor’s kid can do it for free on his Mac and post it to YouTube, surely, a highly paid studio editor can do a half-decent job. Right?
But enough about that. Read the fascinating (and quick) post on Tom Asacker’s blog about advertising’s effect on expectations rather than simply sales. (It deals with movie trailers.) Here’s a sliver:
“Instead of examining the effect of advertising on sales, we examine how advertising affects the updating of market-wide sales expectations. The focus on expectations creates a valuable advantage. Our measure of expectations, which is derived from a stock market simulation, is an accurate predictor of sales.”
Confused? No worries. Click here to read the whole post.

















I think liking or not liking trailers is a totally subjective thing, O.
I can’t believe I’m about to admit this, but one of my guilty pleasures on Saturday mornings is to plant myself in front of the iMac, log in to Quicktime and watch all the new trailers that came out that week. I love trailers. I make sure I show up early to the movie so I can watch the trailers and usually get so wrapped up in the trailers that I forget what movie I’m there to see! For me, trailers are like 2 minute movies – how cool is that?!?
I do come across some pretty crappy ones, but they are usually for pretty crappy movies. But the majority of them, I like. Then again, I’m no film expert, either. I just like the pretty pictures.
I agree 100% about the subjective nature of trailers (and movies) and entertainment in general, for that matter.
Lots of people LOVE American Idol. I don’t.
I love sci-fi. Many people can’t stand it.
So it isn’t surprising that many people enjoy watching trailers that are essentially 2 minute versions of a movie while I prefer to see as little of it as possible in a trailer so the actual movie watching experience will still hold some surprises.
Check out all the trailers for Watchmen or Quantum of Solace on YouTube though… and see if you can discern differences between a series of trailers for the same movie. More often than not, one or two will stand out as being VERY good, while others are… well, not so good. To your point, which fall into what category may change from person to person.
Thanks for the comment, Spike.